Hello Ralf and Magnus, Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > René, thanks a lot for your patch. I just uploaded a new version of the > package with your patch applied.
Ah, I see that I forgot to Cc you in the first reply to your RFA before sending you the patch. ;-) Let me point you here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362958 Looking at your package and reading the upstream development list of the past four months, I got the one or another questions left. 1) 01_american.dpatch: while all patches make perfectly sense to me, I fail to understand this one. Why is it needed to replace English by American? 2) Magnus, are you wanting to continue comaintaining Texmacs or do you both want to give the package away? 3) Now that I made Texmacs compile with GCC4.1, comes the next thing: The fonts. :-) Packaging the Type 1 extra-fonts package of Texmacs and make it available to itself and probably to other packages is what I want to try achieve. As far as I can see only a minority of the fonts in the extra-fonts package are provided by other packages in Debian. However: reading the mailing list archives, upstream says the fonts have been generated out of .mf sources from an "even larger Windows fonts package". Quesions from Magnus about the license do not seem to have been answered: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texmacs-dev/2006-02/msg00000.html | So, does anybody of you know what he is refereing to by "larger | Windows fonts package", where the .mf source and what its license | is? I.e. point me to a thread or such? If not, I'll just ask upstream myself. 4) Is there something else you want to tell or warn me about? ;-) René -- René van Bevern http://progn.org
pgpP33LmW5e4k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
