On 2020-12-27 00:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > clone 894158 -1 > retitle -1 libogg contains RFC released under a non-free license > severity -1 serious > thanks > > On 2018-03-27 11:09, Simon McVittie wrote: > > If the RFCs are false-positives and they are actually Free Software, > > please add Lintian overrides to document this for future contributors. If > > they're non-free, then that's considered a release-critical bug (I can't > > say I'm entirely convinced that applying the DFSG equally to documentation > > is proportionate, but there have been GRs that say it's project consensus > > that we do). > > On 2020-02-29 15:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > control: tags 894158 - pending > > control: tags 894207 - pending > > > > On 2020-02-05 21:46, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Control: tags 894158 + patch > > > Control: tags 894158 + pending > > > Control: tags 894207 + pending > > > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > > > I've prepared an NMU for libogg (versioned as 1.3.4-0.1) and uploaded > > > it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > > > > > > The package has been rejected: > > > > | libogg source: lintian output: 'license-problem-non-free-RFC > > doc/rfc3533.txt', automatically rejected package. > > | libogg source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian > > > > Removing the pending tags accordingly. > > Looking at the licenses, both RFC included in the tarball are definitely > non-free: > > * doc/rfc3533.txt: > > | Full Copyright Statement > | > | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. > | > | This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to > | others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it > | or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published > | and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any > | kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are > | included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this > | document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing > | the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other > | Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of > | developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for > | copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be > | followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than > | English. > | > | The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be > | revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. > | > | This document and the information contained herein is provided on an > | "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING > | TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING > | BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION > | HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF > | MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > * doc/rfc5334.txt: > > | Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). > | > | This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions > | contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors > | retain all their rights. > | > | This document and the information contained herein are provided on an > | "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS > | OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND > | THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS > | OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF > | THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED > | WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > I am therefore cloning that bug, and I am preparing an NMU based on > latest Adrian's upload.
Preparing the NMU, I realised that exceptions have been granted for these two RFCs in debian/copyright. Sorry for not noticing about that earlier. I am therefore closing the bug I have just opened. I am still preparing an NMU based on latest Adrian's upload, this time added lintian overrides so that the package do not get rejected by dak. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
