clone 894158 -1 retitle -1 libogg contains RFC released under a non-free license severity -1 serious thanks
On 2018-03-27 11:09, Simon McVittie wrote: > If the RFCs are false-positives and they are actually Free Software, > please add Lintian overrides to document this for future contributors. If > they're non-free, then that's considered a release-critical bug (I can't > say I'm entirely convinced that applying the DFSG equally to documentation > is proportionate, but there have been GRs that say it's project consensus > that we do). On 2020-02-29 15:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: tags 894158 - pending > control: tags 894207 - pending > > On 2020-02-05 21:46, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Control: tags 894158 + patch > > Control: tags 894158 + pending > > Control: tags 894207 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for libogg (versioned as 1.3.4-0.1) and uploaded > > it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > > > The package has been rejected: > > | libogg source: lintian output: 'license-problem-non-free-RFC > doc/rfc3533.txt', automatically rejected package. > | libogg source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian > > Removing the pending tags accordingly. Looking at the licenses, both RFC included in the tarball are definitely non-free: * doc/rfc3533.txt: | Full Copyright Statement | | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. | | This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to | others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it | or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published | and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any | kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are | included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this | document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing | the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other | Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of | developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for | copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be | followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than | English. | | The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be | revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. | | This document and the information contained herein is provided on an | "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING | TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING | BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION | HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF | MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. * doc/rfc5334.txt: | Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). | | This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions | contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors | retain all their rights. | | This document and the information contained herein are provided on an | "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS | OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND | THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS | OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF | THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED | WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I am therefore cloning that bug, and I am preparing an NMU based on latest Adrian's upload. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
