On 12/11/20 12:33 AM, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote: >> The conclusion being that the proposed changes should be first included >> into upstream directly. > > According to > http://git.liw.fi/vmdb2/log/?showmsg=1 > arm64 support is being developed at the upstream. > armhf, armel, or ppc64el doesn't seem so. > > I am willing to submit a merge request like salsa.debian.org, > but http://git.liw.fi does not seem to accept MR.
In this case, the MR is communicated by email :-) My suggestion would be to clone the repository somewhere (eg: Salsa), implement, and once the implementation is complete, contact Lars for review and merge. Please let me know/if where I can help with any of these steps. Best, Christian
