Hi Simon Am Samstag, den 28.11.2020, 15:52 +0000 schrieb Simon McVittie: > Source: libmediaart > Version: 1.9.4-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: split-gdk-pixbuf > > In Debian 10 and older, the libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev package contains > development files for two libraries: gdk-pixbuf-2.0 and the > deprecated > gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0. > > In testing/unstable, it has been split into libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev > and libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev packages, in preparation for a new > upstream release of gdk-pixbuf-2.0 that moves gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0 > into a separate source package. libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev continues to > exist, but is now a transitional package that pulls in the deprecated > libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev in addition to libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev. > > It looks as though libmediaart only requires the main gdk-pixbuf-2.0 > library. Please update the Depends and Build-Depends so that it only > pulls in that part, as in the attached patch. > > The form suggested in the attached patch is backwards-compatible with > older Debian releases: > > libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev > > but if this package is unlikely to be backported, you can simplify > that > to just the new package: > > libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev >
Given the nature of the package, I would prefer that it is moved under GNOME maintainership (I actually don't know anymore why it is in debian and not the gnome-team salsa namespace on salsa). That said, you can just as well make a Team-Upload and apply any changes you see fit, if you want. Regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
