On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:51:06PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Simon, > > (trying again because the last message was sent when being edited) > > Em seg., 27 de jul. de 2020 às 03:10, escreveu: >> >> Did you look at my approach about embedding the ignores inside >> the build log? This should work for local builds, CI and >> automatic build log parsing. And it can be fully controlled by >> the package maintainer. However, I never used the Salsa CI >> pipeline so feedback if that works (using my patch) is much >> appreciated. > > > Sorry for my delay and my apologies for don't understanding your > approach in first time. > > I tested your patch and it is wonderful. I think it will work fine in > Salsa but we need a package to be updated there. Can you release a new > version? After this, we can reassign some bugs to the original > packages (as ngetty).
Hello Eriberto, thanks for checking that it works. I've just released blhc 0.12 with this change and a few more false positives fixed (ngetty is still open as I think it's a good candidate for the new "inline ignore"). Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
