On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:18 PM Scott Talbert <s...@techie.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >> user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > >> usertags 938836 + py2keep > >> thanks > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:58:50AM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>> - Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option. In > >>> case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping > >>> the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package. Please > >>> don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies, > >>> just document them. > >> > >> The migration path is to wxpython4.0, but upstream did a complete > >> rewrite and it's not a drop in replacement. > > > > I think it's time to remove src:wxpython3.0 ; there are currently no > > reverse dependencies in testing (the only one in sid is src:displaycal > > which has been removed from testing since it's RC buggy), so can we > > proceed with wxpython3.0 removal? > > Won't the ftp masters hold up removal though since displaycal is still in > unstable?
naah not really: as long as we explain the reasons, they tend to be fine (we are not breaking anything that's not already broken, it's a single package, with relative low popcon). at least that's been my experience with py2removal RM bugs -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
