Hi Michael, On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 3:42 AM Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > > Afaics, libmtp-common is affected by this as well. [That] maintainer decided > to override lintian.
I noticed you eventually decided to override Lintian, as well. > Tbh, I'm not sure how to fix this without lintian becoming a udev rules > parsers which understands how those labels are resolved. Like you, I am not sure how to address that. Does systemd offer any validation capabilities? Alternatively, would it be okay to close this bug? We will soon have ways to monitor overrides in the archive (and yours are annotated with this bug number). N: False positive: SUBSYSTEM is tested at the beginning of the rules file. N: See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945934 O: udev: udev-rule-missing-subsystem lib/udev/rules.d/60-autosuspend-chromiumos.rules:100 vendor/product matching missing SUBSYSTEM specifier Kind regards Felix Lechner
