Hi Paul, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. márc. 12., Cs, 12:52): > > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:01 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > > Could you please give this branch a try? > > That definitely looks much better and resolves the issue IMO. > > BTW, there is a related bug that has always been present in the listing > of packages that have been kept back. It lists the suite for the newest > version rather than the suite for the newest version acceptable to > pinning. For example if libc6 is 2.29-9 locally (pin 100), 2.29-10 in > testing (pin 900), 2.30-1 in unstable (pin 800) and 2.31-0experimental0 > in experimental (pin 700) then the listing will look like this: > > Packages with upgradable origin but kept back: > Debian experimental: > libc6 > > instead of this: > > Packages with upgradable origin but kept back: > Debian testing: > libc6
True, fixed that, too. How do you like the fixes now? Cheers, Balint
