Joey Hess, le Wed 29 Mar 2006 18:03:31 -0500, a écrit : > > The current approach --i.e. brltty reads everything that runs on the > > system-- is just fine: programmers write their applications, and only > > very few blind people are needed for maintaining brltty. > > > > What you are proposing (rewriting things for blind users) really isn't > > the good way: these rewritten programs would just act as ghettos for > > blind users. > > cdebconf's text frontend is probably the most appropriate frontend for > use with brtltty anyway,
Are you sure this is really true? I'm not blind so my voice might be suspicious, but I find it a lot easier to use the newt frontend than the text frontend: choosing an option in a long newt list is just a matter of pressing arrows, while browsing through the text list is quite tedious. Dave, Mario? > could be connected to it while still displaying usable[1] > [1] For english at least So you're excluding other languages then. > output to the tty, and is by no means in a ghetto. Are there many people that use the text frontend? The fact that it is currently only included on access floppies, ia64/hppa cdroms and netboot images makes me doubt on that. Really, do you have anything _against_ the "brltty peeks bterm's output" solution? Regards, Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
