Samuel Thibault wrote: > The problem is that it would not only solve the problem only for debian, > but that new front-end would also probably be only developped and tested > by blind people, i.e. very _few_ people, compared to the whole debian > community, hence foresee bugs & such. And I wonder how many blind people > will really want to understand how debconf works etc. > > The current approach --i.e. brltty reads everything that runs on the > system-- is just fine: programmers write their applications, and only > very few blind people are needed for maintaining brltty. > > What you are proposing (rewriting things for blind users) really isn't > the good way: these rewritten programs would just act as ghettos for > blind users.
cdebconf's text frontend is probably the most appropriate frontend for use with brtltty anyway, could be connected to it while still displaying usable[1] output to the tty, and is by no means in a ghetto. -- see shy jo [1] For english at least
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
