Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> This however is a small mystery to me. It would appear the kernel > headers you have included are different in some important aspect > from what I (and others I presume) have been using. I can't > reproduce it myself, nor do I see anything like a likely culprit on > our side of things, can anyone else? I'm just using kernel-source-2.6.10. However, I'm using MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-2.95" after a bad experience with the kernel and gcc-3.3, and that turns out to be the problem. I suspect gcc-2.95 ends up finding /usr/include/linux/usb.h first or something. I'm not sure how important a bug that is; probably I should just use the default gcc and file bugs on the kernel if I hit problems. (It was a while ago when I last tried, and I was using kernel.org tarballs directly; it seems entirely possible that 2.6.10 will work fine, and that the Debian patches to whatever I was trying to compile before would have fixed the problems I was seeing.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
