Hi Ondrej,

On 07:49 Mon 12 Aug     , Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> first of all I would like to say thanks to Andrey. He is hard working to
> remove Python 2 from Debian. It's not easy job.

Indeed, it's not an easy job, thanks for seeing to it.

> 
> ne 11. 8. 2019 v 9:24 odesílatel Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoi...@debian.org>
> napsal:
> 
> > While I understand the urge to get Python 2 out of bullseye as early as
> > possible, I don't feel happy about how this particular case was handled,
> > and I notice that it is not in agreement with what was posted on
> > debian-python[1].
> >
> 
> it was. Cite:
> 
> DPMT / PAPT
> ===========
> No need to wait for a bug report. If you have a leaf package, remove it now.
> 
> If you're not a DD, do it in the git repo and ping Piotr.
> 
> beanstalkc was team leaf package without reverse {build-,}depends.

I never asked why you thought beanstalkc should be removed, I asked why 
you removed it *without letting me know in advance*. beanstalkc had a 
perfectly good reason to be in the archive, which the team couldn't know 
of without parsing the whole source archive and which thus didn't take 
into account.

Cc'ing the uploaders would have taken less than 5 seconds. Figuring out 
what happened, writing two follow-up e-mails and filing the ITP took me 
more than an hour, and this is what I'm complaining about. Pardon me, 
but team maintenance is no excuse for poor communication.

>  - X-Debbugs-Cc beansta...@packages.debian.org at bug report time,
> >    as finding out at the time of *removal* is arguably too late.
> >
> 
> yes, this make sense.

I saw that the next round of removals was Cc'd, so thanks for that.

Regards,
Apollon

Reply via email to