On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 11:52:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> > On 2019-06-26 21:06, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> > > the following translation in the "FEATURE AREAS" -> "qa" might need
> > > some improvement:
> > > 
> > > LANG=C man dpkg-buildflags ___snip___ canary This  setting
> > > (disabled  by  default) adds dummy canary options to the build
> > > flags, so that the build logs can be checked for how the build
> > > flags propagate and to allow finding any omission of normal build
> > > flag settings.  The only currently supported flags are CPPFLAGS,
> > > CFLAGS, OBJCFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and OBJCXXFLAGS with flags set to
> > > -D__DEB_CANARY_flag_random-id__, and LDFLAGS set to
> > > -Wl,-z,deb-canary-random-id. __snip__
> > > 
> > > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 man dpkg-buildflags __snip__ canary Diese
> > > Einstellung  (standardmäßig  deaktiviert)  fügt 
> > > Pseudo-Kanarienvögel-Optionen  zu  den  Bauschaltern  hinzu, so
> > > dass die Bauprotokolle überprüft werden können, wie die Bauschalter
> > > sich fortpflanzen. Dies erlaubt, Auslassungen in den normalen
> > > Bauschaltereinstellungen zu finden. Derzeit werden nur die Schalter
> > > CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS,  OBJCFLAGS,  CXXFLAGS  und OBJCXXFLAGS
> > > unterstützt,  wobei  die  Schalter  auf 
> > > -D__DEB_CANARY_Schalter_Zufallskennung__  gesetzt  werden, und
> > > LDFLAGS,  das  auf -Wl,-z,deb-canary-Zufallskennung gesetzt wird. 
> > > __snip__
> > 
> > My german might be rusty (it's probably worse than that these days)
> > but the translation looks ok to me.
> 
> I can't speak to the quality of most of the translation (I read German,
> but not fluently enough to have a good sense of how idiomatic it is);
> but -D__DEB_CANARY_flag_random-id__ and -Wl,-z,deb-canary-random-id
> currently have individual "words" within them translated and this is
> definitely wrong.

No, these are supposed to be translated, they are marked with italics
(which got lost on the paste above), as part of replaceable text.

Thanks,
Guillem

Reply via email to