On Tue 2019-05-07 22:48:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> This is not the recommended way of using autodep8, albeit it does fix an
> issue that is worrying me a bit [1]. You are supposed to add a
> "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-<flavor>" to the source stanza of your
> package and never look back. See $(man autodep8).

That's news to me.  I see no such documentation:

1 dkg@alice:~$ dpkg -l autodep8
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version      Architecture Description
+++-==============-============-============-=================================
ii  autodep8       0.18         all          DEP-8 test control file generator
0 dkg@alice:~$ man autodep8 | grep -i autopkgtest-pkg
1 dkg@alice:~$ 

If you could clarify this someplace that developers could find, it would
be very much appreciated.

> [1] currently the autopkgtest framework uses the version of autodep8
> from the host, which is typically up-to-date. However the test may have
> only been working with an older version of autodep8. E.g. package from
> stable/stretch that pass with autodep8 from stable/stretch may fail with
> autodep8 from buster.

understood -- but fwiw, i don't think this is particularly a problem.
that's a very similar issue as any other test suite failure caused by
shifting dependencies.

         --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to