Hi Scott, Reply follows inline.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:31:23PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Package: calibre > Version: 3.39.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 3.3 > > Debian policy requires a valid maintainer address: > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > prein...@debian.org > Unrouteable address > > From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> > Subject: Processing of calibre_3.39.1+dfsg-1_source.changes > Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:27:18 +0000 > X-Debian: DAK > X-DAK: DAK > Precedence: bulk > Auto-Submitted: auto-generated > X-Debian-Package: calibre > Message-Id: <e1gr9bw-0001br...@usper.debian.org> > > calibre_3.39.1+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost > along with the files: > calibre_3.39.1+dfsg-1.dsc > calibre_3.39.1+dfsg.orig.tar.xz > calibre_3.39.1+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz > calibre_3.39.1+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo > > Greetings, > > Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) > > --1549405639-eximdsn-1087713461-- > > Scott K Thank you for bringing this to my attention, as far as I know, Norbert I've contacted him using his other email address, to ask to use that address as maintainer. Worst case scenario, what is the deadline to adopt Calibre? I believe Norbert is still the maintainer, but am willing to adopt the package if I do not receive consent to publish a package using his private address before $deadline. Regards, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
