Le vendredi 21 décembre 2018 à 16:14 -0800, Mike Miller a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 09:05:36 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I think it would make sense to add an autopkgtest for that specific > > issue, to detect it should it appear again. > > > > The only drawback with respect to putting it as a failure in > > debian/rules is that autopkgtest are only routinely exercised on amd64. > > Ok, how about something like the attached? This can be extended to check > for other features (arpack, SuiteSparse, etc) that we want to require.
That sounds good to me. > Could this not also be run in the dh_auto_test target to cover all > arches at least once when they are built? Sure, we could test both at build time and in autopkgtest. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
