Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 12:33, Sven Hoexter <hoex...@debian.org> a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:12:39PM -0500, Studio Support wrote: > > Hello Andrey, > > > > Regarding the solution on Bug#916859 about our package "pdfstudioviewer" > > > > It's free in the real sense of the term, meaning that users don't pay > for it. But it is not open source. Our end-user license is displayed to > users upon running our application the first time. > > > > We don't care if our application is listed under the Free or the > Commercial products. > > > > We have a Debian installer so I hope you can use that. > > Hi, > I, and propably many more Debian developers, appreciate that you try to > engange > with the Debian project, but really we're focused on open source software. > You might > want to read https://www.debian.org/social_contract.html > > So yes it's true that we have this sad part called "non-free" on our > mirrors but formally > it's not really part of the distribution, and still everything shipped in > non-free requires > to have a source package as well. > https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage > > In the end I can only encourage you to open source your software, > otherwise you've to move > on and distribute it via your own self hosted repository. > > Sven > Another solution would be to distribute your software via Flatpak or Snap which most distributions, including Debian, support very well. Ghis >
