On 11/11/2018 02:47 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 02:29:31PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote: >> On 11/06/2018 05:09 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:10:37PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2018 03:48 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote: >>>>>> Hi Bill, >>>>>> >>>>>> in the upstream ticket the question came up if we should focus on >>>>>> porting sage to gap 4.9 or 4.10. If we manage to finish the patch for >>>>>> gap 4.9 in time, would you promise not to upload gap 4.10 shortly >>>>>> before the freeze if that would break sage again? >>>>> Do not worry, I am not going to upload 4.10 shortly before the freeze, >>>>> this is too risky even without taking Sage into account (which I >>>>> definitely take into account). >>>>> >>>>> Maybe we need to decide on some cut off date for GAP 4.10.1 >>>>> release (4.10.1 was expected to be released on 2018/11/01). >>>>> >>>>> Would 2018/11/18 be agreeable to you ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>> I don't even know if 4.9 or 4.10 would be better for sage, just that >>>> having a decision soon would be good so that we can tell them what to >>>> target. >>> If this is useful to you, you can download a git snapshot of GAP 4.10 from >>> https://github.com/gap-system/gap/archive/stable-4.10.zip >>> >>> I will ask the GAP team for the likely release date. >>> >>> Cheers, >> GAP 4.10.0 was released and the saegmath team is working on the update >> to GAP 4.10, so it would be better for us to have GAP 4.10 in buster. > OK, I have started looking at packaging GAP 4.10 already. > However, I would really like GAP 4.9.3 to reach testing so that we get > the whole set of GAP pkg in testing at once, but the autopkgtest fails: > > autopkgtest for gap-float/0.9.1+ds-1: amd64: Regression ♻ > autopkgtest for gap-guava/3.13+ds-2: amd64: Regression ♻ > autopkgtest for gap-io/4.5.1+ds-1: amd64: Regression ♻ > autopkgtest for gap-laguna/3.7.0+ds-1: amd64: Regression ♻ > autopkgtest for gap-scscp/2.1.4+ds-3: amd64: Regression ♻ > autopkgtest for gap-sonata/2.8+ds-1: amd64: Regression ♻ > > Do you understand what happen ? > > Cheers,
I think most of them are actually fine. The failing tests are mostly with the versions in testing, so if the packages can migrate together with gap, the test failure should not matter. However gap-sonata was not updated and some packages are waiting for gap-smallgrp to migrate to testing. Best, Tobias
