Package: checkstyle Version: 8.14-1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer,
when running checkstyle on Debian unstable I get this warning: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- $ checkstyle -c checkstyle-easy.xml file.java [warning] /usr/bin/checkstyle: JVM flavor 'sunmin5' not understood ... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Everything seems to work fine, but the warning made me think that something was wrong with checkstyle itself while it's the wrapper scripts which gives it instead. Not sure what the cause is, this is the java version I am using: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- $ java --version openjdk 11.0.1 2018-10-16 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1+13-Debian-2) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.1+13-Debian-2, mixed mode, sharing) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages checkstyle depends on: ii antlr 2.7.7+dfsg-9.2 ii default-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless] 2:1.11-70 ii java-wrappers 0.3 ii libantlr4-runtime-java 4.6-2 ii libcommons-beanutils-java 1.9.3-1 ii libcommons-cli-java 1.4-1 ii libcommons-lang3-java 3.8-1 ii libcommons-logging-java 1.2-2 ii libguava-java 19.0-1 ii openjdk-10-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless] 10.0.2+13-2 ii openjdk-11-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless] 11.0.1+13-2 checkstyle recommends no packages. Versions of packages checkstyle suggests: pn ant-optional <none> pn junit4 <none> -- no debconf information -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
