Control: severity -1 important On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:31PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: samba-libs > Version: 2:4.8.5+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'wheezy' to 'jessie' to 'stretch' to 'buster'. > Its successor installed fine in 'wheezy', and upgraded to 'jessie' and > 'stretch' > successfully, > but then the upgrade to 'buster' failed, > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. > See policy 7.6 at > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces > From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > Selecting previously unselected package samba-libs:amd64. > Preparing to unpack .../29-samba-libs_2%3a4.8.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking samba-libs:amd64 (2:4.8.5+dfsg-1) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-sgTROH/29-samba-libs_2%3a4.8.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libndr-krb5pac.so.0.0.1', > which is also in package libndr-standard0:amd64 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u2 > dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > libndr-standard0 was last seen in oldoldstable. I don't think this warrants a serious severity, because the samba-libs package as of oldstable already shipped libndr-krb5pac.so.0.0.1 and if the only way anyone has filed a bug report about it is after doing a piuparts test across 4 releases, then the missing Breaks doesn't seem to have had much practical impact despite the fact that samba4 was entirely obsoleted by samba version 4.2 (and therefore by samba-libs) in oldstable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature