Thanks, but that was not the assumption, rather the assumption that myspell-xx and hunspell-xx are offering the same content. And Hunspell succeeded MySpell. Based on that, that the hunspell package is the newer or more up to date.
The situation now is, that there is "myspell-xx-author1" and "hunspell-xx-authorA". Similar case would be that "python-numpy" and "python3-numpy" are assumed to be by the same author and offer the same functionality. A mistake that could be made less often with perhaps other package names (-dsdo), especially by non-advanced users. But I leave it at what it is, wontfix. Thanks for your feedback. On 07/07/2018 12:45 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Pander (2018-07-07 12:00:02) >> Thanks for the explanation. That doesn't make it easier for the end >> user. Me and my colleagues also thought that hunspell-da is _the_ one >> and best one to use and that myspell-da is the same, but created a >> while back and packaged for myspell. Easy mistake to make. > Please clarify what is the issue, before trying to solve it. > > It seems you make an assumption that there will be one true correct > disctionary for each language. I disagree with that. > > how do you know if "Oxford English Dictionary" is the one you want for > english? > > > - Jonas >
