On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:48:51PM +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> >I don't see a "good" solution to this. Short of changing
> >
> >PP(pp_gvsv)
> >{
> > dVAR;
> > dSP;
> > EXTEND(SP,1);
> > if (PL_op->op_private & OPpLVAL_INTRO)
> > PUSHs(save_scalar(cGVOP_gv));
> > else
> > PUSHs(GvSVn(cGVOP_gv));
> > RETURN;
> >}
> >
> >so that we increment the reference count of GvSVn and arrange for that
> >reference count to drop later.
>
> What is "later" here? - would scope exit do i.e. can we jut increment
> refcnt and push it to the "temps" stack?
Yes, I think that that "later" would do.
I was more concerned that it wouldn't be trivial to spot the specific case
we need to guard for, and wouldn't be cheap to do it all the time.
Nicholas Clark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
