Le lun 06 mar 2006 14:51:13 CET, Daniel Baumann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> So you are seriously suggesting to hack a crapped 2.4 support in it
> although that in about 4-5 month, the base system is freezed for etch?
> Hm, I don't think this is worthy when we have m-a to semi-autobuild the
> modules in a sane way anyway.
No, if your module source could be used with 2.4 ! In fact, I prefer (also) to
build it out of tree !
>...
> That has nothing to do with 2.6.15, the problem is that upstream
> provides just patches, so I had to unpack them, fix the include
> definitions (debian/patches/01-includes.dpatch) and set a variable
> (debian/patches/02-defaults.dpatch).
I thought it was more difficult ...
> > And do you think the same source (out of tree) could compile with a 2.4
> > kernel ?
>
> yep (if one add a 2.4 specific patch containing the diff between 2.4 and
> 2.6).
It could be nice... I'll try to have look in this direction...
with regards,
Fred.
