Hi,

The version of madwifi in debian is *not* madwifi-ng, it is from the madwifi-old branch. It is totally working correctly with the wpasupplicant package in debian.

 Since the old driver is not supported anymore, is less stable than
 the new one, lacks some features and does not work with newer cards,
 the madwifi team urges most users to switch to the new driver.

Huh! This is absolutely not true.

I am responsible for madwifi in debian (along with team members) and also heavily involved with upstream development and support of madwifi.

Tonight I asked in irc if these facts are correct:-

<kelmo_lap> otaku42, did you make a public anouncement about distributions adopting the madwifi-ng code? <otaku42> kelmo_lap: not yet, apart from what i've replied in one or two mails on the lists.
<kelmo_lap> someone states this:
<kelmo_lap> Since the old driver is not supported anymore, is less stable than the new <kelmo_lap> one, lacks some features and does not work with newer cards, the madwifi
<kelmo_lap> team urges most users to switch to the new driver.
<otaku42> kelmo_lap: that's new to me. do you have a chance to ask the person where this information comes from?
<kelmo_lap> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354388

otaku42 is Michael Renzmann, the Madwifi project leader.

madwifi-ng is *not* as stable as madwifi-old. Yes it does support more stuff, but that is not the point. wpasupplicant is compatible with the madwifi package provided by debian. When madwifi-ng is tagged as "stable for distributions to use" by the majority of the Madwifi developers, I will organise the upload of it, and make sure wpasupplicant is updated with the relevant headers (unless someone thinks of a better solution).

madwifi-old *is* supported, I even applied a maintenance patch to it recently. However, it is not currently developed any further, only bugs are fixed.

 Out of curiosity, does madwifi-ng not implement WE19 completely? If
 it does, then it should work with the 'wext' interface of wpasupplicant.

madwifi-ng does not use the wext driver ioctl's, but its own, btw :-)

Thanks, Kel.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to