Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 04/01/2018 02:13 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Please remove pyosmium from arm64 & armhf, the python3.6 dependency >> chain is not installable on those architectures, and the missing builds >> will block testing migration. > > 1) is there a good reason for which pyosmium needs to migrate to testing > right away and couldn't possibly wait a few days more?
Yes, python3.6 is already available in testing, that is sufficient to have pyosmium working there. > 2) arm64 is already good again, waiting a couple more hours would have > been enough indeed armhf still looks hopeless. > 3) I'm quite sure we want python3.6 to be installable on those > architectures, so I'm very positive the underlying issue will be > fixed given enough time, instead of having to workaround it like you > are trying to do. I don't want users of pyosmium to have to wait for that. They primarily use amd64 and shouldn't be penalised by issues in Debians other architectures. Kind Regards, Bas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
