On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:44:43PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> 
> I've also thinked about this because bridge-utils is basically dead upstream
> while iproute2 is integrating more and more stuff, so having the bridge
> support on ifupdown and depending on iproute2 instead of bridge-utils may be
> the way to go.

That is fine with me.
> 
> If you agree with this we'll have to talk on how we do this.

To my understanding it is basically translating the the hook scripts that
call brctl now to corresponding call to ip. While at it, adding
vlan-awareness ;-)

Again, having a look at what ifupdown2 does exeactly could help.

Bye,

Joerg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to