Hi! > It looks to me like iproute2 now provides a superset of vconfig and > brctl, so yes, perhaps it should all be configured using iproute2. > However, the bridge support for ifupdown currently lives in the > bridge-utils package, so that's why I've reassigned the bug there. But > if there is a desire to move the ifupdown integration scripts to the > ifupdown package, I'd not be opposed to that.
I've also thinked about this because bridge-utils is basically dead upstream while iproute2 is integrating more and more stuff, so having the bridge support on ifupdown and depending on iproute2 instead of bridge-utils may be the way to go. If you agree with this we'll have to talk on how we do this. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
