On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 01:21:54PM +0000, Paulo Almeida wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > I see, ispell.pt is more recent, unfortunately Evolution uses aspell. > I don't know anything about the internals of spell checkers, so I > can't give any input on that, but I'd be willing to help maintain the > package, if you think it's useful.
Hi, Seems I did not explain myself well enough. What I will try is to generate aspell-pt aspell dictionary from ispell.pt. To check if that is he best approach I will try to generate an aspell affix file from ispell affix file (I wrote a script for that a while ago, used by a good number of ispell->aspell conversions) and compare. If they are similar, upstream is doing the same, and I can automate aspell dict build from ispell sources (in a similar way as I am doing for espa~nol ispell dict). If upstream uses some ad-hoc fine-tuning of the affix file for aspell, I will have to use the aspell dict sources. Just need the time to test this, Regards, -- Agustin
