Dear Junichi! Dear Yu!
On Mit, 22 Feb 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I have seen that you have done the last NMU of dvipdfmx, and I wanted to
> > ask if we (you or me) can do another NMU with the suggested changes in
> > my bug report
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353584, that is:
> > ----
> > - Change the dependency on tetex-bin and tetex-base in both cases
> > to | texlive-base-bin
> > (and by the way maybe you want to eliminate the texmf.d file as there is
> > already an entry for CMAP in tex-common and thus in texmf.cnf, and
> > remove the update-texmf calls in postinst/rm)
> > ----
> >
> > This way I could switch the TeX live packages to use the dvipdfmx as it
> > is in Debian without shipping a version myself.
>
>
> As long as you don't break anything, I don't have anything against it.
I have prepared a version -0.3 which is available from
deb(-src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
I attach the diff between the two packages.
What I did:
- changed the control file to include texlive
- removed the texmf.d config file
since tex-common is already in testing, this file should thus be
useless
- fixed the lintian error of wrong FSF error
If someone could take a look, and if you Yu can comment on this as the
maintainer, that what be great.
In any case I would like to do this NMU (ok via a sponsor since I am not
DD) soon, since it blocks the upload of the next version of texlive to
unstable.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million
for good thinking, yeah?
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
