Thx
Yu Guanghui <ygh at debian.org>
On 2/28/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > > As long as you don't break anything, I don't have anything against it.
>
> It seemed it breaks something a bit ;-)
>
> > - removed the texmf.d config file
> > since tex-common is already in testing, this file should thus be
> > useless
>
> tex-common sets
> CMAPFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/cmap//
> but dvipdfmx needs to set
> CMAPINPUTS = .;/usr/share/fonts/cmap//
> so the configfile is yet necessary IMHO.
>
> BTW, there is messing up in dvipdfmx. Wnen Yu maintained
> it there was 50dvipdfmx.cnf but now 80DVIPDFMx.cnf instead.
> (contents of 80DVIPDFMx.cnf seemed better, though)
> I don't know which NMU installed 80DVIPDFMx.cnf but it is
> very bad states now.
1:20050831-0.1 (lee's upload) changed it. The contents of
80DVIPDFMx.conf seems to be superior to 50dvipdfmx.conf, so I've left
it intact.
> I believe it need some active maintainer of dvipdfmx.
I agree, how about adding it to the tetex-maint co-maintenance? I'm
willing to chime in.
Yu, if you have any objections after 1 year+ of silence, please shout
now.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]debian.org,netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
