On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 19:12 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2018-01-18 21:59, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > (Compiling now fails for the 32-bit, but I could reverse the > > > > process if > > > > needed, I guess.) > > > > > > That is expected. We stopped shipping both amd64 and i386 blobs > > > in > > > the > > > same package at the time when the amd64 kernel was removed from > > > the > > > i386 > > > architecture (because just the foreign amd64 kernel could be > > > installed). > > > > > > And given that noone has requested being able to be build modules > > > for > > > amd64 and i386 simultaneously, I'm not going investigate how to > > > make > > > this package M-A: same :-) > > We could at least mention the supported blob architectures in the > long > Description. And we could reenable shipping i386+amd64 blobs for > 304xx, > given that this seems to be broken on i386, so it might be reasonable > to > expect i386 userspace with a amd64 kernel there ... > > > Also the next series after 390 is going to drop i386 altogether so > > not > > much point... > > Oh, where did you get that info from? > > > Andreas
It was in the tech news a couple of weeks ago: http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4604/ -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
