On 2018-01-18 21:59, Luca Boccassi wrote: >>> (Compiling now fails for the 32-bit, but I could reverse the >>> process if >>> needed, I guess.) >> >> That is expected. We stopped shipping both amd64 and i386 blobs in >> the >> same package at the time when the amd64 kernel was removed from the >> i386 >> architecture (because just the foreign amd64 kernel could be >> installed). >> >> And given that noone has requested being able to be build modules for >> amd64 and i386 simultaneously, I'm not going investigate how to make >> this package M-A: same :-)
We could at least mention the supported blob architectures in the long Description. And we could reenable shipping i386+amd64 blobs for 304xx, given that this seems to be broken on i386, so it might be reasonable to expect i386 userspace with a amd64 kernel there ... > Also the next series after 390 is going to drop i386 altogether so not > much point... Oh, where did you get that info from? Andreas
