On Friday 24 February 2006 01:15, you wrote:
[...]
> digikam: WARNING: Running dcraw command : dcraw -c -2 -w -a -q 0
> '/home/shared/pictures/new/2006, February, 23/IMG_0841.JPG'
> sh: dcraw: command not found
> digikam: WARNING: Not a raw digital camera image.
Uhm, that's bad! dcraw is only necessary for RAW images, not jpegs.
We had a similar problem with PPC. There was an endian problem
(this was fixed in -3).
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121646
http://bugs.debian.org/351931
But now you have a similar problem with AMD64 :( Can you append
tany picture (small ones prefered ;) that are shown black
to the bug report or post an URL where we can download it?
When you visit the album with konqueror, is the image identified
as jpeg by konqueror? Just to be sure: kuickview, gwenview or
other image displayer can display the jpeg, right?
> Looks like we're missing an app. Thanks!
Yeah, digikam only recommends dcraw ... uhm wait ... no it
does not :( This is now fixed in svn.
Gilles: see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=351931
for the complete thread. The jpeg/dcraw patch used in digikam is
your first version, using kfilemetainfo.
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/kde-extras/digikam/trunk/debian/patches/10_kdesvn_r507545_fix_jpeg_on_ppc.diff?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
But when konqueror identifies it as jpeg then kfilemetainfo should
be okay, right? Can the be another 64bit problem somewhere?
Achim
>
--
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
