On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:19:44AM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2006 01:15, you wrote: > [...] > > digikam: WARNING: Running dcraw command : dcraw -c -2 -w -a -q 0 > > '/home/shared/pictures/new/2006, February, 23/IMG_0841.JPG' > > sh: dcraw: command not found > > digikam: WARNING: Not a raw digital camera image. > > Uhm, that's bad! dcraw is only necessary for RAW images, not jpegs. > We had a similar problem with PPC. There was an endian problem > (this was fixed in -3). > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121646 > http://bugs.debian.org/351931 > > But now you have a similar problem with AMD64 :( Can you append > tany picture (small ones prefered ;) that are shown black > to the bug report or post an URL where we can download it?
It is, indeed, a jpeg as I checked/viewed it with gqview fine. Here it is, a pic of my cat ;) (2.4MB, not shrunk because I wanted to give you the exact data that can reproduce this. http://spherevision.org/visual/testfordigikam.jpg > When you visit the album with konqueror, is the image identified > as jpeg by konqueror? Just to be sure: kuickview, gwenview or > other image displayer can display the jpeg, right? Have verified, it's a jpeg, straight from my Canon, xferd from digikam. > > Looks like we're missing an app. Thanks! > > Yeah, digikam only recommends dcraw ... uhm wait ... no it > does not :( This is now fixed in svn. > > Gilles: see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=351931 > for the complete thread. The jpeg/dcraw patch used in digikam is > your first version, using kfilemetainfo. > > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/kde-extras/digikam/trunk/debian/patches/10_kdesvn_r507545_fix_jpeg_on_ppc.diff?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 > > But when konqueror identifies it as jpeg then kfilemetainfo should > be okay, right? Can the be another 64bit problem somewhere? > > Achim Odd thing is that in the last version, it worked fine.. Thanks, -r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]