On 12/12/2017 12:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > no idea whether my mails missed you. Can we ask for removal of this package? > I really want to clean up our bugs of serious bugs. Hi, sorry, I did not get your email (spam?) .
Yes, I think we can ask for removal of biomaj-watcher, users should switch to biomaj3 now. Olivier > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:23:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Ping? What about removal of biomaj-watcher? >> >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Hi Olivier, >>> >>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 you wrote: >>>> As this package version is deprecated in favor of biomaj3 (in NEW queue at >>>> this time), this is not really needed to fix. >>> Since biomaj3 is available now do you want to open a Request Of Removal bug >>> to get this settled? >>> >>> I'd also think that the bug is only closes in the case that package >>> python3-biomaj3 "Provides: biomaj" to provide a clean upgrade path. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Andreas. >>> >>> -- >>> http://fam-tille.de >> -- >> http://fam-tille.de -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
