On 2017-11-06 11:17+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:07:40AM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > >> OK, I've setup a package for libreoffice-zotero-integration. Can you please >> check https://git.gueux.org/libreoffice-zotero-integration.git ? > > Great, that was fast! > > It looks good. > > I'm just wondering whether we could relicense the debian/ work under AGPL-3+, > because it always make more sense to have the debian packaging under the same > license as upstream (e.g. when sending patch). I am ok for relicensing, but I > guess we need to ask Michèle Cane. This is not a high priority item though. > >> I'm waiting for debian-science to join the team before uploading the repo to >> alioth (if I can, I'm not sure if repo creation is still allowed with the >> alioth migration). Then, maybe you could also sponsor the upload to >> experimental? > > Why experimental and not unstable? Is the new version of the plugin > incompatible with Zotero 4? If yes, then that should be reflected in > dependencies (but then it's probably too early to upload it).
It is not compatible with Zotero 4, as the Zotero part of the libreoffice extension is now plugged in zotero-standalone. The package just installs the libreoffice part. I've updated the control file to reflect this. OK, so we'll wait until having a zotero-standalone 5 package ready. I think having the new firefox extension ready should not be a blocker, though (in the case we don't have the tools ready to package it in time). Concerning the zotero-standalone package, I guess it would be easier to also start from the beginning for the new package, as it was completely reworked. You still have no objection in me doing so? I'll try to see what javascript libs need to be packaged.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
