On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 07:50:00AM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > On 2017-11-05 19:12+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> As you may have already seen, this is a rather complex package. > > Yes :-). Upstream seems to have completely modified the distribution, and now > provides one repo for each of zotero-standalone, zotero-connectors, > zotero-libreoffice-integration, which may help to go back to something more > sustainable. They also seem to have switched to javascript-only for > zotero-standalone, but they use a recent version of nodejs, so we need to wait > for #880936...
Too bad :( > I'd like to move to something manageable, with git-buildpackage. Note that the existing setup already uses git-buildpackage. It's the orig tarball which is custom. > A first step would be to add a new source package for > zotero-libreoffice-integration, and to upload this one to experimental. This > one may build with the bits taken from the current zotero-standalone-build > source package. > > Do you have objections if I start from the beginning for this package? I'll > import the changelog and the other needed bits from zotero-standalone-build > but > we'll lose the git history. That's fine with me. > I've asked the Debian Science administrators to join. Ok, let me know if your request is not processed in time. You may also want to look at http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html (it is outdated in a few places, e.g. priority extra is deprecated, and Vcs-Browser shoud use /cgit/, not /git/) Thanks, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
