also sprach Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.14.0906 +0100]: > I understand that - anyways some people might consider this > information in logcheck's mails usefull (as I do). Could we aggre > on filtering out Usage Attributes but keep the information about > Pre-Failure attributes.
Sounds like a debconf question to me... I'd be happy with you considering my request and doing whatever you deem appropriate. However, I do like the "pre-warning" of when an attribute's value approaches the threshold. I think we should ask upstream to add such a feature. E.g. if THRESH is 40 and the value reaches 40+d with a tendency to further decrease, special warnings should be issues to the log and possibly spat out by email. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "the intellect is not a serious thing, and never has been. it is an instrument on which one plays, that is all." -- oscar wilde
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
