On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:36:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.13.1717 +0100]:
> > Hmm...it's debatable if everyone wants them removed from the logs.
> 
> not logs, but logcheck output. smartd will send warnings itself when
> bad things happen.
I phrased this badly. I meant to say from logchecks generated mails.

> > It would be better if we still log when attributes move towards
> > their failure point. 
> 
> This would need to happen in smartd, which would generate
> a different log message or send a warning when this happens. I am
> only concerned about logcheck.
I understand that - anyways some people might consider this information
in logcheck's mails usefull (as I do). Could we aggre on filtering out
Usage Attributes but keep the information about Pre-Failure attributes.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to