On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2017-03-31 18:38 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:24:46PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> >> 2017-03-31 18:16 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>:
> >> > If I understand the situation correctly:
> >> >
> >> > 1. The only known RC issue here is that terminix frequently (but not
> >> > always)
> >> > FTBFS on armhf, and
> >> > 2. no other package or architecture is known to be affected, and
> >> > 3. looking at the upstream bug the root cause might not be found soon.
> >> >
> >> > What about making terminix in stretch
> >> > Architecture: any [!armhf]
> >> >
> >> > This would be the smallest possible removal to cover the RC part of this
> >> > bug for stretch.
> >>
> >> This bug doesn't affect the Terminix in Stretch...
> >>...
> >
> > How did you come to this conclusion?
> >
> > Before writing my suggestion I did try to build terminix 1.3.0-5
> > in a stretch_armhf chroot on harris, and it did fail the same way.
>
> Oh? That's news to me, and actually pretty good to know - and pretty bad...
> I compiled it fine a while back (with the same compiler version), and
> the issue popped up with a bugfix release upload in Sid, so I assumed
> Terminix would still build fine on armhf in Stretch.
>
> Weird.
We already know from the successful build of 1.5.2-2 that building
terminix on armhf sometimes succeeds...
> Cheers,
> Matthias
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
