On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:24:46PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2017-03-31 18:16 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>:
> > If I understand the situation correctly:
> >
> > 1. The only known RC issue here is that terminix frequently (but not always)
> > FTBFS on armhf, and
> > 2. no other package or architecture is known to be affected, and
> > 3. looking at the upstream bug the root cause might not be found soon.
> >
> > What about making terminix in stretch
> > Architecture: any [!armhf]
> >
> > This would be the smallest possible removal to cover the RC part of this
> > bug for stretch.
>
> This bug doesn't affect the Terminix in Stretch...
>...
How did you come to this conclusion?
Before writing my suggestion I did try to build terminix 1.3.0-5
in a stretch_armhf chroot on harris, and it did fail the same way.
> Cheers,
> Matthias
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
