-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 12:56 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > No. I don't want to do that. Packages should be consistent across > architectures. > Either we fix it, or let it FTBFS on these architectures. > > @Breno: Is this the version you are talking about ? 2.1.0~beta2+dfsg-3 > bpfcc is not targeted for Stretch anyways, so I can add a dependency on this > version to test. > By the way, can you point me to the bug report that talks about the luajit > patch > for ppc64el ?
This bug is done from the build perspective, but I'm still eager to hear your feedback of its runtime on all the built architectures. So please, if you can, do run the scripts on the respective architectures and share your results. I'm also interested on reports on i386. Thanks, Ritesh - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAlibPTIACgkQpjpYo/Lh dWkzlQ//RtaWgzhZY3nhuddMr5Rw8rGDMldpJP4wrxQmv2MoRbViVWdwCE+JaI27 Ks/eiC8zdighUghuOHmOJKAWuiUeGNWN/qIq7mkYl9cVmJ9yLL7ouaUNiFFSv0Yw ob4R1iyYIXL6eXW2cv55AdZpwW7qRy2ST7ckttdx4hIeIUo1Gsr8G9XeeadeYOtv YkVCoswsjGy53FDvfg62iU0gaOTV4+CUq+PD2b3wfmT0NvYwoYssfjSRKqYsmZoF TKRfGq1FU3/KacgKu8DYXl5KCilAk/k0wacHOATIOb0/AMAriWRn/icrIsyJkYj9 snvx+JX6Q0CFFHannQlvHpvB1a/9ISI/8GQXq0TceS6fR4Zi+4s0pYqcRuV1wuV+ S//X83YwAW2VvobZpQTUM8YpuRo5p66mt3ceZzPSkVOZHguHqh5unjU00c8XV4l0 qjYu4hnV0h3ddC1ILJrVoqFzrOePPPKqLZJ8NHlXAUg7WF/hvxnnjTbfDBQwU/p1 fSuTmOatRNe9eiKYRyHFA3b7QphyPewndjMQ9jdxaIq3ADbsLYh+109WTaxvUG3g HP8KqFkiLFRGQQOHgMgiM5BiUmtXKUQ6zmASBdsOHr4s7B/0/skZTYYBE8pwfj9K EU//2lzZvGBACyXOH5brPSfMLy8kHCtQyt6QAvZQr/0qEzhJMwA= =8fyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
