-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello Naveen,
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 23:18 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > I'm not familiar with lua/luajit, but can it be made optional for > ppc64el and aarch64? > > Upstream has a similar fix for rpm distros: > https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/commit/ef91b6ed64d022baec977a8415581cd1a4a218c5 Thanks for the link. The RH folks are doing similar things to what I tried but their changes are confined to the RPM build script. That doesn't help Debian but the changes are almost the same to what I was attempting. But I'm still curious to see how those changes fix the actual bug I encountered. Because for non-luajit setups, the build would still fail. Did you try building BCC on Debian with my (incomplete) patch ? Let me pick the exact build failure. [ 81%] Generating bcc.lua Scanning dependencies of target test_static cd /build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/lua && /usr/bin/lua5.3 /build/bpfcc-0.2.0/src/lua/src/squish.lua /build/bpfcc-0.2.0/src/lua make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' make -f tests/cc/CMakeFiles/test_static.dir/build.make tests/cc/CMakeFiles/test_static.dir/build Writing bcc.lua... OK! make[3]: Entering directory '/build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' [ 83%] Generating bcc.o cd /build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/lua && /usr/bin/lua5.3 bcc.lua bcc.o /usr/bin/lua5.3: bcc.lua:1656: ')' expected near 'ULL' src/lua/CMakeFiles/bcc-lua.dir/build.make:64: recipe for target 'src/lua/bcc.o' failed make[3]: *** [src/lua/bcc.o] Error 1 [ 85%] Building C object tests/cc/CMakeFiles/test_static.dir/test_static.c.o make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:676: recipe for target 'src/lua/CMakeFiles/bcc-lua.dir/all' failed make[2]: *** [src/lua/CMakeFiles/bcc-lua.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... cd /build/bpfcc-0.2.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/cc && /usr/lib/ccache/cc -I/usr/lib/llvm-3.8/include/../tools/clang/include -I/build/bpfcc-0.2.0/src/cc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/b pfcc-0.2.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -no-pie -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -O3 -DNDEBUG -o CMakeFiles/test_static.dir/test_static.c.o -c /build/ bpfcc-0.2.0/tests/cc/test_static.c [ 87%] Linking CXX executable test_static The same code builds fine with luajit. So that begs the question of what Lua does different than Luajit. Can someone help me with the following ? * What is the luajit equivalent in Lua? Lua has `luac` and `lua5.3`, which are the compiler and the interpreter respectively. * Command option equivalent. ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( OUTPUT bcc.o COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua bcc.o DEPENDS bcc.lua ) For luajit, "-bg" is understood. What we need is the equivalent of it in lua/luac. - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAliaFA8ACgkQpjpYo/Lh dWkM8Q//SNcAAZ0iojISqOzmUAy46u5WLz7NFc4COiML5X5Bmn6M0yWp5zyzB+NM npEd3bpXENFm+PLLor6AZElWp6jSUxDfmyH1oQb1ZjzfwFRDSrEAq08uabYDspxe JWMK49g49/swiiEoxQcc+WZ+5PNoUPEz0Xvg/TC0PksbUrurKDfxveKvo/1ic3Hp ZpdMANsu94VSyDAAxPFeWpFXH0BxELaDNiznz9B3fHi0jywkdxVUUxhjZkwO/Rig xMv2ihuRNNu73365Y0V/2NrC89s0B6Bcl080GKsjfyOvQsnun8E3pJ9uvATDpSaH SP+wEHJmG89xuLWlSdCKyqRQoRZHPg5wq7RUBSKngHxnWzbJGSU3QOwcsHUj3X7O llH86hGap3XI3rU5ug5G1tTjGPY655750PEInUecYR/BmqPfsp4lE+oGweH1GHAn YB7RhLMQvyIWb44v037qdu+eIzn7UGowpVP0+MFGXxh09abU0+csu1o7bag76OHZ Jw+kJQWCXGcby2gJKo/z5dddBsc/6MI5OyS7QX0LP4yrINfRiPUL9DuKOO3BVBRU Qn2xLQs6vuMW/UWL0/n1uNQyoaDH/D1SSvy2zApatN4XrGpWv8rTSfX2yDwitwi3 1NXb+qFulaiez3v+w00qFcDLNLyj8VkYfSrgaUm0PrTJB4J8CXg= =fT56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
