Quoting Simon McVittie (2017-01-29 17:57:26) > On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 at 17:42:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I agree that sugar-base-0.88 makes sense to drop from Debian. > > Let's make that happen.
Thanks! > According to `dak rm -R -n` this would involve removal of the > following source packages, not all of which were previously mentioned > on the bug: > > sugar-base-0.88 > sugar-datastore-0.88 > sugar-toolkit-0.88 > sugar-presence-service-0.88 > sugar-moon-activity > > which variously have a history of NMUs and removals from testing, > suggesting that they may be eating up more developer time than they > justify. > > In addition https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.cgi mentions > sugar-irc-activity; I'm not sure why that doesn't agree with `dak rm -R -n`. I don't understand dak at all, so appreciate your work here. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
