Control: clone 833157 -2 Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -2 RM: sugar-base-0.88 -- RoQA; superseded by sugar-base Control: severity -2 normal
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 at 17:42:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I agree that sugar-base-0.88 makes sense to drop from Debian. Let's make that happen. According to `dak rm -R -n` this would involve removal of the following source packages, not all of which were previously mentioned on the bug: sugar-base-0.88 sugar-datastore-0.88 sugar-toolkit-0.88 sugar-presence-service-0.88 sugar-moon-activity which variously have a history of NMUs and removals from testing, suggesting that they may be eating up more developer time than they justify. In addition https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.cgi mentions sugar-irc-activity; I'm not sure why that doesn't agree with `dak rm -R -n`. Regards, S at the Cambridge BSP (from a distance)
