On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 19:55:55 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kurt Roeckx dixit: > >And if only 1.0 is affected, I'm not sure why it's assigned to the > >openssl source package.
It's not. > I’m not sure why Guillem reassigned the bug either, considering > I cloned it in the first place to have one part in openssl1.0 > and one in dpkg (or, more likely, gcc-6)… Yes, and that's why I reassigned one part precisely to openssl1.0 and not openssl. :) Thanks, Guillem
