On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:55:55PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kurt Roeckx dixit: > > >> Unfortunately, I have no idea; 1.1 builds, 1.0 doesn’t. > > > >But both are actually in installed state now? > > Yes because I built it in a chroot in which I downgraded dpkg > to .10, which led to a completely fine build of openssl1.0 > with testsuite enabled even. > > >And if only 1.0 is affected, I'm not sure why it's assigned to the > >openssl source package. > > I’m not sure why Guillem reassigned the bug either, considering > I cloned it in the first place to have one part in openssl1.0 > and one in dpkg (or, more likely, gcc-6)…
So I'm rather confused. I at least see some mention of a log with -fPIC before the -specs, and then failing to link because it's not build using -fPIC but the specs override that to use -fPIE. So I would need to find a way to move the -fPIC after the flags set by dpkg. But I don't actually find any log on buildd.debian.org that shows that problem. In any case, 1.1 seems to place the -fPIC after the CFLAGS from dpkg, so I guess moving it around will fix things. But the errors I've always been seeing is a segfault during the tests, and I have no idea what that is about. Kurt