On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov , Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061
> > with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298
> > 828277"):
> > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > >
> > > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166
> > > > 828412 828298 828277
> > > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> > ...
> > > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298,
> > > 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
> >
> > 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> > I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> >
> > Did you get the wrong bug ?
>
> I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was
> accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that
> #812166 was previously a blocker[1].
>
> On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
Hrm; that's not supposed to happen.
Let me check that out and see if I can fix it.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372
