Hi Ian,
On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov , Ian Jackson wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061
> with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412
> > > 828298 828277
> > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> ...
> > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298,
> > 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
>
> 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
>
> Did you get the wrong bug ?
I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was
accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that
#812166 was previously a blocker[1].
On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on
#827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on
two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
Regards,
Apollon
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=877
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=1032
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=921
